Another blurry example of so called Bigfoot evidence can be seen, from the images and samples provided, the background is clear and easily visible. The Pictures presented how ever are a different story. It seems always the case. Why can’t folks get an actual shot of the magnificent one? why can’t they actually get D.N.A evidence to support their finds?
Perhaps the title of this blog should be, the ultimate Bigfoot shitting? as the investigator claimed the big furry one was crunched down as if persona or in this case Bigfoot may have been doing his daily chores and business.
I do not know what you all think about the blurry type 0f pictures, but to anyone with common sense the digital imaging nightmares are over and we have some of the most sophisticated equipment around, so their should not be room any longer for blurry pictures. especially being associated with poor camera angles.
Inside the article itself!
The Sasquatch enthusiast has raised many eyebrows before, attracting the attention of critics and skeptics wanting to debunk what he calls evidence. That is what happened in late June when he released the images of what appeared to be a big-eyed monkey-like animal.